Ning Changes and Our Network - from your administrators

[Connie Crosby]

As has been pointed out previously, Ning recently announced changes to their business model: many networks that were once free to run will now be charged a fee. The cost for our network, since we have more than 150 members, would be $199.95 US for the first year (a special introductory price) for the Ning Plus plan. A full breakdown on new Ning pricing plans is here. The following year the cost is expected to be higher; that cost will be roughly $315 US although there may be special offers encouraging us to renew. This new pricing will be implemented in July, and once in place we will have 30 days to pay into the system or move.

The four administrators of this network have come up with a plan as to what we feel would work best for this network. This post is meant to explain our thinking, and invite your thoughts and suggestions.

The Law Libraries and Librarians network founded by Jim Milles is administered by the following volunteers:

Connie Crosby
Lyonette Louis-Jacques
Roger Skalbeck
Elizabeth Farrell


Our thoughts:

• We would like to see the Law Libraries and Librarians network continue. At over 700 members (and growing) we feel this network fills a need and has value. It is not tied to a particular association, and is international in scope. It allows anyone with an interest in law libraries and librarianship to participate, regardless of the role you play inside your own organization. It has the potential to allow people to connect and possibly provide professional development opportunities for each other.
  
• Many other networks have moved away from Ning since the announcement. We feel moving would be too difficult for us, and that we would lose many members in the process.
• While the cost is (for those of us in North America) not too high, it is still more than we want to pay out of pocket personally.
  
• We do not wish to go to a membership fee model either for this network. Administration of collecting money would create more work for us, and we feel it might prohibit some from continuing with this group. Also, Ning will apparently be taking a portion of membership monies collected through their networking system.
• We like the idea of  a "tip jar" system where people can voluntarily contribute a nominal amount if they find value in the network and can afford to contribute (for example, 63 people contributing $5 each would likely cover the cost next year). However, it may be difficult to rally us together to pay this in time.
  
  

Proposed solution:

• Look for one sponsor willing to cover the $199 for the first year. We would want this sponsor to be a good fit with this community. We present a very focused membership which would provide a good marketing opportunity. Getting the first year cost covered will give us time to decide for next year whether we would like to continue with a sponsor or move to the tip jar model, or some other solution. Who knows, we may even want to upgrade to the next level up (Ning Pro) to take advantage of more features.
  
• We came up with a few ideas of potential sponsors to approach. Fortunately, when Roger Skalbeck participated in the May 24th episode of the Law Librarian Conversations podcast and explained our situation, a potential sponsor came forward: NELLCO (the New England Law Library Consortium). We feel they are a good fit and are in the process of negotiating with them; however, it is not too late to hear other ideas.
  
  

The next step:

Once we have finalized what we are going to do, we want to work on encouraging more activity in this network. As community managers we haven't participated enough, haven't been engaging people enough in discussion. This network has so much potential! We need to take this opportunity and see what we can do with it. We will really need your help to give this community some direction and fulfill its potential.

We need to hear from you:

Please let us know in the comment space below whether you think this plan makes sense. Do you have other ideas?  And how would you like to see this space used?

Cheers,
Connie

[Ruth Bird]

I think this is a great idea, and I praise NELLCO for being willing to support the site. NELLCO is an enabling organisation, so this is a very good fit. Well done Connie, Lyo, Roger & Elizabeth!
Ruth

[Anne Myers]

I agree with Ruth. Maintaining our Ning community benefits us professionally and I would hate to see if disappear. NELLCO is a perfect sponsor, especially as its a non-profit organization for law libraries and works to support us and our work in other ways. Thanks to all of you for figuring out a solution!

Anne

[Barbara Silbersack]

Very helpful of NELLCO to step up, especially in these times. Do enough law librarians know about Ning? Could you stand to promote it again?

[Lyonette Louis-Jacques]

Thanks, Ruth! This network has been wonderful. I love the ease of joining and the photos and info folks are sharing here. It has so much potential too. Thanks for your support! Take care, Lyo.

Ruth Bird said:

I think this is a great idea, and I praise NELLCO for being willing to support the site. NELLCO is an enabling organisation, so this is a very good fit. Well done Connie, Lyo, Roger & Elizabeth!
Ruth

[Betsy McKenzie]

I am very relieved that we are talking about NELLCO rather than a vendor! I was worried that we were walking down the same primrose path that AALL has been down and now finds itself compromised in not being able to really speak strongly about vendors' practices. Thank you, Tracy, for stepping up! This is a perfect solution!

[Lyonette Louis-Jacques]

Thanks, Anne! It's great having this Ning as a professional and social space. And it's not a time-waster...:-) Thanks for being on board and your support! Ciao, Lyo.

Anne Myers said:

I agree with Ruth. Maintaining our Ning community benefits us professionally and I would hate to see if disappear. NELLCO is a perfect sponsor, especially as its a non-profit organization for law libraries and works to support us and our work in other ways. Thanks to all of you for figuring out a solution!

Anne

[Lyonette Louis-Jacques]

Thanks, everyone! We'd love to hear other thoughts on the NELLCO plan, and any other ideas for continuing the Law Libraries and Librarians Ning, and using this space. Merci d'avance! :-) Mahalo, Lyo.

[Ann Fessenden]

I agree that NELLCO sounds perfect as a sponsor and I hope that works out. I confess I do sometimes forget about the NING so I hope ways can be found to get more interaction going on it.

[Shaunna Mireau]

I am also an infrequent visitor, though I hope the site continues. Short term sponsorship is a great idea, but what about a longer term relationship? Except for a paypal donation request with surplus funds being maintained in a sustainability account I have no constructive ideas. I like long term sustainability plans in general.

[John Nann]

I also praise NELLCO for stepping forward and believe that they are a good fit as a sponsor. I agree that this is a useful forum, but admit to not participating nearly enough. Thank you!

[Marylin J. Raisch]

This network is valuable although I have been inactive recently. A big thanks to NELLCO for stepping up to help!
Marylin

[Joan M. Bellistri]

I, too, have not been active. It would not display right at work but today it does so this may change. It is good idea to keep it going and appreciate that you have figured out a way to continue.